CF has the strongest read, and the most behind it.
Both lean bullish. The difference is evidence and record: CF’s read rests on 3,410 contracts but our 4h record on it is 24%; CF’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
LINCFtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Mildly bullish | Mildly bullish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | ||
| Composite | +20.6 | +22.7 |
| Evidence | 49 | 56 |
| Quality | 77 | 78 |
| Price | $481.70 | $111.54 |
| Contracts today | 777 | 3,410 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid −1.11% · n=9,499 | hasn’t paid −1.11% · n=9,499 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | ||
| Our record here, 4h | 14% of 1,433 checked | 24% of 425 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.