MCFT has the strongest read; PTON has the most behind it.
Both lean bullish. The difference is evidence and record: PTON’s read rests on 6,467 contracts but our 4h record on it is 26%; MCFT’s bucket has paid historically.
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02
Tape, 36 days, same axis
MCFTPTONtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Strongly bullish | Strongly bullish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | ||
| Composite | +90.8 | +73.3 |
| Evidence | 35 | 68 |
| Quality | 23 | 80 |
| Price | $19.11 | $4.92 |
| Contracts today | 0 | 6,467 |
| Calibration | has paid +33.79% · n=8,863 | hasn’t paid −1.23% · n=7,893 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | ||
| Our record here, 4h | 0% of 33 checked | 26% of 221 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.