MDLZ has the strongest read; GIS has the most behind it.
All three lean bullish. The difference is evidence and record: GIS’s read rests on 1,940 contracts but our 4h record on it is 12%; MDLZ’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.
Sign in to save these 3 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
MDLZGISCALMtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Mildly bullish | Mildly bullish | Mildly bullish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | |||
| Composite | +15.3 | +15.0 | +12.5 |
| Evidence | 59 | 68 | 67 |
| Quality | 85 | 84 | 83 |
| Price | $60.67 | $32.14 | $64.75 |
| Contracts today | 1,014 | 1,940 | 950 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid −0.15% · n=8,854 | hasn’t paid −0.15% · n=8,854 | hasn’t paid −0.15% · n=8,854 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | |||
| Our record here, 4h | 17% of 352 checked | 12% of 113 checked | 0% of 34 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.