Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Sat 10 Oct 2026/US closed · opens Mon 14:30 BST/127 names scored today/last score 13:21 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / META vs FOXA · /stock/META?vs=FOXA (was /compare/META,FOXA)

META has the strongest read, and the most behind it.

Both lean bullish. The difference is evidence and record: META’s read rests on 263,820 contracts but our 4h record on it is 22%; META’s bucket has paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02

Tape, 43 days, same axis

METAFOXAtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
META Meta Platforms · Media×
FOXA Fox · Media×
The readStrongly bullishStrongly bullish
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite+34.9+26.9
Evidence 83 63
Quality8474
Price$740.11$62.70
Contracts today263,8203,735
Calibrationhasn’t paid −0.01% · n=92,310
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h22% of 2,000 checked18% of 349 checked

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add AMCWhy is META’s record 22%?