Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Sat 10 Oct 2026/US closed · opens Mon 14:30 BST/127 names scored today/last score 13:22 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / META vs TTWO · /stock/META?vs=TTWO (was /compare/META,TTWO)

META has the strongest read, and the most behind it.

Both lean bullish. The difference is evidence and record: META’s read rests on 263,820 contracts but our 4h record on it is 22%; META’s bucket has paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02

Tape, 43 days, same axis

METATTWOtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
META Meta Platforms · Media×
TTWO Take-Two Interactive … · Media×
The readStrongly bullishMildly bullish
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite+34.9+15.8
Evidence 83 58
Quality8478
Price$740.11$214.81
Contracts today263,8202,531
Calibrationhasn’t paid −1.11% · n=9,499
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h22% of 2,000 checked13% of 301 checked

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add AMCWhy is META’s record 22%?