Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Sat 10 Oct 2026/US closed · opens Mon 14:30 BST/117 names scored today/last score 11:59 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / META vs GOOGL · /stock/META?vs=GOOGL (was /compare/META,GOOGL)

META has the strongest read, and the most behind it.

Both lean bullish. The difference is evidence and record: META’s read rests on 263,820 contracts but our 4h record on it is 22%; META’s bucket has paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
META Meta Platforms · Media×
GOOGL Alphabet · Media×
The readStrongly bullishStrongly bullish
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite+34.9+34.0
Evidence 83 83
Quality8485
Price$740.11$348.61
Contracts today263,820494,883
Calibration
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h22% of 2,000 checked20% of 2,000 checked
02

Tape, 43 days, same axis

METAGOOGLtape_history · hourly, daily close shown

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add AMCWhy is META’s record 22%?