NB has the strongest read; FCX has the most behind it.
Two lean bullish, no bearish. The difference is evidence and record: FCX’s read rests on 33,102 contracts but our 4h record on it is 25%; NB’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.
Sign in to save these 3 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
NBNEMFCXtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Strongly bullish | Mildly bullish | Neutral |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | |||
| Composite | +83.3 | +11.9 | +0.1 |
| Evidence | 72 | 70 | 76 |
| Quality | 71 | 87 | 91 |
| Price | $3.40 | $117.84 | $72.60 |
| Contracts today | 3,710 | 4,783 | 33,102 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid −0.01% · n=92,310 | hasn’t paid −0.25% · n=9,682 | neutral · −0.51% · n=4,671 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | |||
| Our record here, 4h | 19% of 560 checked | 66% of 778 checked | 25% of 1,122 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.