Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Sat 10 Oct 2026/US closed · opens Mon 14:30 BST/109 names scored today/last score 11:07 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / NB vs NEM, MP, FCX · /stock/NB?vs=NEM,MP,FCX (was /compare/NB,NEM,MP,FCX)

NB has the strongest read; MP has the most behind it.

Two lean bullish, no bearish. The difference is evidence and record: MP’s read rests on 15,575 contracts but our 4h record on it is 20%; NB’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 4 names as a list.
02

Tape, 43 days, same axis

NBNEMMPFCXtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
NB NioCorp Developments · Metals & Mining×
NEM Newmont · Metals & Mining×
MP MP Materials · Metals & Mining×
FCX Freeport-McMoRan · Metals & Mining×
The readStrongly bullishMildly bullishNeutralNeutral
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite+83.3+11.9+9.0+0.1
Evidence 72 70 76 76
Quality71879291
Price$3.40$117.84$47.00$72.60
Contracts today3,7104,78315,57533,102
Calibrationhasn’t paid −0.01% · n=92,310hasn’t paid −0.25% · n=9,682neutral · −0.51% · n=4,671neutral · −0.51% · n=4,671
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h19% of 560 checked66% of 778 checked20% of 743 checked25% of 1,122 checked

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add ABATWhy is MP’s record 20%?