Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Sat 10 Oct 2026/US closed · opens Mon 14:30 BST/109 names scored today/last score 11:07 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / NEM vs MP, FCX · /stock/NEM?vs=MP,FCX (was /compare/NEM,MP,FCX)

NEM has the strongest read; MP has the most behind it.

One lean bullish, no bearish. The difference is evidence and record: MP’s read rests on 15,575 contracts but our 4h record on it is 20%; NEM’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 3 names as a list.
NEM Newmont · Metals & Mining×
MP MP Materials · Metals & Mining×
FCX Freeport-McMoRan · Metals & Mining×
The readMildly bullishNeutralNeutral
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite+11.9+9.0+0.1
Evidence 70 76 76
Quality879291
Price$117.84$47.00$72.60
Contracts today4,78315,57533,102
Calibrationhasn’t paid −0.25% · n=9,682neutral · −0.51% · n=4,671neutral · −0.51% · n=4,671
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h66% of 778 checked20% of 743 checked25% of 1,122 checked
02

Tape, 43 days, same axis

NEMMPFCXtape_history · hourly, daily close shown

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add NBWhy is MP’s record 20%?