Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Sun 11 Oct 2026/US closed · opens Mon 14:30 BST/161 names scored today/last score 14:46 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / NU vs TD, BAC · /stock/NU?vs=TD,BAC (was /compare/NU,TD,BAC)

NU has the strongest read; BAC has the most behind it.

One lean bullish, no bearish. The difference is evidence and record: BAC’s read rests on 273,460 contracts but our 4h record on it is 11%; NU’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 3 names as a list.
NU Nu Holdings · Banking×
TD Toronto-Dominion Bank · Banking×
BAC Bank of America · Banking×
The readStrongly bullishNeutralNeutral
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite+32.9−1.1−6.3
Evidence 74 62 76
Quality827785
Price$15.38$117.10$53.64
Contracts today24,107383273,460
Calibrationhasn’t paid −1.37% · n=22,387neutral · +0.40% · n=12,401neutral · +1.26% · n=1,013
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h25% of 1,034 checked17% of 260 checked11% of 1,553 checked
02

Tape, 43 days, same axis

NUTDBACtape_history · hourly, daily close shown

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add CWhy is BAC’s record 11%?