Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Wed 14 Oct 2026/US open/289 names scored today/last score 16:03 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / ORCL vs AAPL, PD · /stock/ORCL?vs=AAPL,PD (was /compare/ORCL,AAPL,PD)

PD has the strongest read; ORCL has the most behind it.

One lean bullish, one bearish. The difference is evidence and record: ORCL’s read rests on 154,903 contracts but our 4h record on it is 20%; PD’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 3 names as a list.
02

Tape, 43 days, same axis

ORCLAAPLPDtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
ORCL Oracle · Technology×
AAPL Apple · Technology×
PD PagerDuty · Technology×
The readMildly bullishNeutralStrongly bearish
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite+23.1+7.5−29.0
Evidence 91 89 38
Quality979743
Price$143.57$333.40$16.69
Contracts today154,903369,48388
Calibrationneutral · +2.02% · n=721hasn’t paid +0.36% · n=16,987
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h20% of 825 checked11% of 1,968 checked6% of 232 checked

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add SQWhy is ORCL’s record 20%?