Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Sat 10 Oct 2026/US closed · opens Mon 14:30 BST/127 names scored today/last score 13:22 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / PG vs LOVE · /stock/PG?vs=LOVE (was /compare/PG,LOVE)

LOVE has the strongest read; PG has the most behind it.

One lean bullish, one bearish. The difference is evidence and record: PG’s read rests on 5,195 contracts but our 4h record on it is 26%; LOVE’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02

Tape, 43 days, same axis

PGLOVEtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
PG Procter & Gamble · Consumer products×
LOVE Lovesac · Consumer products×
The readStrongly bullishStrongly bearish
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite+37.2−68.6
Evidence 67 65
Quality8066
Price$144.91$14.59
Contracts today5,195970
Calibrationhasn’t paid −1.64% · n=25,061hasn’t paid +0.10% · n=21,921
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h26% of 315 checked5% of 2,000 checked

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add LENWhy is PG’s record 26%?