Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Sat 10 Oct 2026/US closed · opens Mon 14:30 BST/117 names scored today/last score 11:59 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / PGR vs MET · /stock/PGR?vs=MET (was /compare/PGR,MET)

MET has the strongest read, and the most behind it.

No lean bullish, one bearish. The difference is evidence and record: MET’s read rests on 1,653 contracts but our 4h record on it is 31%; MET’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
PGR Progressive · Insurance×
MET MetLife · Insurance×
The readNeutralMildly bearish
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite+5.2−25.0
Evidence 54 65
Quality7786
Price$218.73$98.47
Contracts today1,1471,653
Calibrationneutral · +0.46% · n=12,762hasn’t paid +2.29% · n=7,579
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h28% of 295 checked31% of 326 checked
02

Tape, 43 days, same axis

PGRMETtape_history · hourly, daily close shown

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add TRVWhy is MET’s record 31%?