Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Sat 10 Oct 2026/US closed · opens Mon 14:30 BST/117 names scored today/last score 11:59 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / PRU vs CB, MET · /stock/PRU?vs=CB,MET (was /compare/PRU,CB,MET)

MET has the strongest read, and the most behind it.

One lean bullish, one bearish. The difference is evidence and record: MET’s read rests on 1,653 contracts but our 4h record on it is 31%; MET’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 3 names as a list.
02

Tape, 43 days, same axis

PRUCBMETtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
PRU Prudential Financial · Insurance×
CB Chubb Limited · Insurance×
MET MetLife · Insurance×
The readMildly bullishNeutralMildly bearish
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite+24.5−6.9−25.0
Evidence 55 59 65
Quality788286
Price$112.60$343.78$98.47
Contracts today1,6061,0891,653
Calibrationhasn’t paid −1.11% · n=9,499neutral · +9.94% · n=4,567hasn’t paid +2.29% · n=7,579
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h24% of 261 checked40% of 403 checked31% of 326 checked

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add TRVWhy is MET’s record 31%?