PYPL has the strongest read, and the most behind it.
Both lean bullish. The difference is evidence and record: PYPL’s read rests on 26,699 contracts but our 4h record on it is 4%; PYPL’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
PYPLVtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Strongly bullish | Mildly bullish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | ||
| Composite | +30.1 | +24.3 |
| Evidence | 82 | 77 |
| Quality | 93 | 91 |
| Price | $55.02 | $375.10 |
| Contracts today | 26,699 | 9,367 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid −1.64% · n=25,061 | hasn’t paid −0.74% · n=9,948 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | ||
| Our record here, 4h | 4% of 2,000 checked | 32% of 321 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.