Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Sat 10 Oct 2026/US closed · opens Mon 14:30 BST/127 names scored today/last score 13:22 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / QQQ vs XLF · /stock/QQQ?vs=XLF (was /compare/QQQ,XLF)

XLF has the strongest read, and the most behind it.

No lean bullish, one bearish. The difference is evidence and record: XLF’s read rests on 184,520 contracts but our 4h record on it is 6%; XLF’s bucket has paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02

Tape, 43 days, same axis

QQQXLFtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
QQQ etf×
XLF etf×
The readNeutralMildly bearish
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite−8.8−24.5
Evidence 76 79
Quality8584
Price$759.66$53.62
Contracts today9,308,911184,520
Calibrationneutral · +1.15% · n=1,055
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h4% of 1,125 checked6% of 522 checked

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add IWMWhy is XLF’s record 6%?