Stocks / RZLT vs AMGN, MRNA, ENGN · /stock/RZLT?vs=AMGN,MRNA,ENGN (was /compare/RZLT,AMGN,MRNA,ENGN)
ENGN has the strongest read; MRNA has the most behind it.
One lean bullish, one bearish. The difference is evidence and record: MRNA’s read rests on 52,509 contracts but our 4h record on it is 23%; ENGN’s bucket has paid historically.
Sign in to save these 4 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
RZLTAMGNMRNAENGNtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Strongly bullish | Neutral | Neutral | Strongly bearish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | ||||
| Composite | +50.5 | −0.1 | −5.9 | −83.3 |
| Evidence | 50 | 66 | 75 | 68 |
| Quality | 60 | 88 | 92 | 60 |
| Price | $4.38 | $406.81 | $194.91 | $1.75 |
| Contracts today | 960 | 4,176 | 52,509 | 3,311 |
| Calibration | has paid +0.20% · n=52,410 | neutral · −1.25% · n=6,966 | neutral · +0.12% · n=835 | has paid −0.48% · n=9,069 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | ||||
| Our record here, 4h | 5% of 97 checked | 16% of 662 checked | 23% of 761 checked | 4% of 1,389 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.