XLF has the strongest read, and the most behind it.
Both lean bearish. The difference is evidence and record: XLF’s read rests on 184,520 contracts but our 4h record on it is 6%; XLF’s bucket has paid historically.
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
SCHDXLFtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Mildly bearish | Mildly bearish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | ||
| Composite | −23.5 | −24.5 |
| Evidence | 55 | 79 |
| Quality | 75 | 84 |
| Price | $33.15 | $53.62 |
| Contracts today | 4,055 | 184,520 |
| Calibration | has paid −0.44% · n=91 | has paid −0.36% · n=233 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | ||
| Our record here, 4h | 11% of 700 checked | 6% of 522 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.