Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Mon 19 Oct 2026/US extended hours · opens Tue 14:30 BST/358 names scored today/last score 21:27 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / SQ vs SNOW · /stock/SQ?vs=SNOW (was /compare/SQ,SNOW)

SQ has the strongest read, and the most behind it.

One lean bullish, no bearish. The difference is evidence and record: SQ’s read rests on 43,471 contracts but our 4h record on it is 0%; SQ’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02

Tape, 38 days, same axis

SQSNOWtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
SQ technology×
SNOW Snowflake · Technology×
The readStrongly bullishNeutral
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite+34.5+9.6
Evidence 88 77
Quality9795
Price$0.00$343.00
Contracts today43,47126,550
Calibrationhasn’t paid −1.09% · n=8,431neutral · +0.01% · n=2,880
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h0% of 146 checked10% of 244 checked

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add ORCLWhy is SQ’s record 0%?