ABCL has the strongest read; TMO has the most behind it.
One lean bullish, one bearish. The difference is evidence and record: TMO’s read rests on 3,444 contracts but our 4h record on it is 24%; ABCL’s bucket has paid historically.
Sign in to save these 3 names as a list.
| The read | Mildly bullish | Neutral | Mildly bearish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | |||
| Composite | +15.4 | −9.7 | −22.5 |
| Evidence | 67 | 59 | 67 |
| Quality | 83 | 83 | 86 |
| Price | $653.09 | $217.46 | $12.83 |
| Contracts today | 3,444 | 4,602 | 7,206 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid −1.11% · n=9,499 | neutral · +9.94% · n=4,567 | has paid −0.22% · n=1,509 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | |||
| Our record here, 4h | 24% of 283 checked | 27% of 355 checked | 37% of 929 checked |
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
TMODHRABCLtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.