XLY has the strongest read; IWM has the most behind it.
No lean bullish, one bearish. The difference is evidence and record: IWM’s read rests on 412,364 contracts but our 4h record on it is 19%; XLY’s bucket has paid historically.
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
XLYIWMtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Strongly bearish | Neutral |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | ||
| Composite | −31.1 | −6.6 |
| Evidence | 62 | 85 |
| Quality | 79 | 93 |
| Price | $110.04 | $270.44 |
| Contracts today | 2,134 | 412,364 |
| Calibration | has paid −0.38% · n=14,059 | neutral · +0.64% · n=659 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | ||
| Our record here, 4h | 17% of 410 checked | 19% of 2,000 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.