Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Sat 10 Oct 2026/US closed · opens Mon 14:30 BST/310 names scored today/last score 21:39 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / XPEV vs NIO · /stock/XPEV?vs=NIO (was /compare/XPEV,NIO)

NIO has the strongest read, and the most behind it.

One lean bullish, one bearish. The difference is evidence and record: NIO’s read rests on 8,532 contracts but our 4h record on it is 8%; NIO’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02

Tape, 43 days, same axis

XPEVNIOtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
XPEV Xpeng · Automobiles×
NIO NIO · Automobiles×
The readMildly bearishStrongly bullish
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite−19.3+66.6
Evidence 68 69
Quality8780
Price$9.92$3.39
Contracts today19,2658,532
Calibrationhasn’t paid −1.64% · n=25,061
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h20% of 564 checked8% of 2,000 checked

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add TSLAWhy is NIO’s record 8%?