Stocks / SMCI vs ORCL, SNOW, AAPL · /stock/SMCI?vs=ORCL,SNOW,AAPL (was /compare/SMCI,ORCL,SNOW,AAPL)
SMCI has the strongest read; ORCL has the most behind it.
Two lean bullish, no bearish. The difference is evidence and record: ORCL’s read rests on 154,903 contracts but our 4h record on it is 20%; SMCI’s bucket has paid historically.
Sign in to save these 4 names as a list.
| The read | Strongly bullish | Mildly bullish | Neutral | Neutral |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | ||||
| Composite | +31.6 | +23.1 | +9.6 | +7.5 |
| Evidence | 90 | 91 | 77 | 89 |
| Quality | 95 | 97 | 95 | 97 |
| Price | $31.63 | $143.57 | $343.00 | $333.40 |
| Contracts today | 310,015 | 154,903 | 26,550 | 369,483 |
| Calibration | has paid +2.09% · n=3,360 | hasn’t paid +0.00% · n=5,022 | neutral · +0.09% · n=2,937 | neutral · +0.64% · n=659 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | ||||
| Our record here, 4h | 25% of 726 checked | 20% of 825 checked | 10% of 244 checked | 11% of 1,968 checked |
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
SMCIORCLSNOWAAPLtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.