AAP has the strongest read; AMZN has the most behind it.
All four lean bullish. The difference is evidence and record: AMZN’s read rests on 353,705 contracts but our 4h record on it is 15%; AAP’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.
Sign in to save these 4 names as a list.
| The read | Strongly bullish | Strongly bullish | Strongly bullish | Strongly bullish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | ||||
| Composite | +43.9 | +41.8 | +32.9 | +30.2 |
| Evidence | 63 | 88 | 96 | 90 |
| Quality | 83 | 95 | 97 | 94 |
| Price | $41.97 | $107.00 | $254.06 | $110.43 |
| Contracts today | 2,282 | 61,270 | 353,705 | 166,855 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid −0.01% · n=92,310 | has paid +1.17% · n=12,971 | has paid +1.17% · n=12,971 | has paid +1.17% · n=12,971 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | ||||
| Our record here, 4h | 38% of 725 checked | 28% of 908 checked | 15% of 2,000 checked | 30% of 685 checked |
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
AAPBABAAMZNWMTtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.