ALMS has the strongest read; TLRY has the most behind it.
All three lean bullish. The difference is evidence and record: TLRY’s read rests on 8,914 contracts but our 4h record on it is 15%; ALMS’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.
Sign in to save these 3 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
ALMSJNJTLRYtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Strongly bullish | Strongly bullish | Strongly bullish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | |||
| Composite | +56.0 | +43.5 | +35.8 |
| Evidence | 70 | 73 | 76 |
| Quality | 86 | 85 | 90 |
| Price | $6.97 | $258.41 | $3.58 |
| Contracts today | 5,612 | 10,222 | 8,914 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid −1.37% · n=22,387 | hasn’t paid −1.37% · n=22,387 | hasn’t paid −1.37% · n=22,387 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | |||
| Our record here, 4h | 21% of 817 checked | 14% of 1,447 checked | 15% of 172 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.