Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Sat 10 Oct 2026/US closed · opens Mon 14:30 BST/117 names scored today/last score 11:59 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / BABA vs AMZN, TGT · /stock/BABA?vs=AMZN,TGT (was /compare/BABA,AMZN,TGT)

BABA has the strongest read; AMZN has the most behind it.

All three lean bullish. The difference is evidence and record: AMZN’s read rests on 353,705 contracts but our 4h record on it is 15%; BABA’s bucket has paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 3 names as a list.
02

Tape, 43 days, same axis

BABAAMZNTGTtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
BABA Alibaba Group Holding · Retail×
AMZN Amazon.com · Retail×
TGT Target · Retail×
The readStrongly bullishStrongly bullishMildly bullish
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite+41.8+32.9+11.0
Evidence 88 96 74
Quality959791
Price$107.00$254.06$154.76
Contracts today61,270353,70512,024
Calibrationhasn’t paid −1.08% · n=2,328
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h28% of 908 checked15% of 2,000 checked18% of 1,069 checked

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add WMTWhy is AMZN’s record 15%?