Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Sat 10 Oct 2026/US closed · opens Mon 14:30 BST/109 names scored today/last score 11:07 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / BABA vs AMZN, COST · /stock/BABA?vs=AMZN,COST (was /compare/BABA,AMZN,COST)

BABA has the strongest read; AMZN has the most behind it.

All three lean bullish. The difference is evidence and record: AMZN’s read rests on 353,705 contracts but our 4h record on it is 15%; BABA’s bucket has paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 3 names as a list.
BABA Alibaba Group Holding · Retail×
AMZN Amazon.com · Retail×
COST Costco Wholesale · Retail×
The readStrongly bullishStrongly bullishMildly bullish
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite+41.8+32.9+19.6
Evidence 88 96 81
Quality959792
Price$107.00$254.06$947.92
Contracts today61,270353,70523,932
Calibrationhasn’t paid −0.74% · n=9,948
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h28% of 908 checked15% of 2,000 checked38% of 1,615 checked
02

Tape, 43 days, same axis

BABAAMZNCOSTtape_history · hourly, daily close shown

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add WMTWhy is AMZN’s record 15%?