Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Sat 10 Oct 2026/US closed · opens Mon 14:30 BST/127 names scored today/last score 13:22 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / BABA vs AMZN, ROST · /stock/BABA?vs=AMZN,ROST (was /compare/BABA,AMZN,ROST)

BABA has the strongest read; AMZN has the most behind it.

Two lean bullish, one bearish. The difference is evidence and record: AMZN’s read rests on 353,705 contracts but our 4h record on it is 15%; BABA’s bucket has paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 3 names as a list.
BABA Alibaba Group Holding · Retail×
AMZN Amazon.com · Retail×
ROST Ross Stores · Retail×
The readStrongly bullishStrongly bullishStrongly bearish
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite+41.8+32.9−41.6
Evidence 88 96 63
Quality959783
Price$107.00$254.06$221.61
Contracts today61,270353,7051,021
Calibrationhasn’t paid +0.10% · n=21,921
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h28% of 908 checked15% of 2,000 checked17% of 257 checked
02

Tape, 43 days, same axis

BABAAMZNROSTtape_history · hourly, daily close shown

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add WMTWhy is AMZN’s record 15%?