ECL has the strongest read; CF has the most behind it.
One lean bullish, one bearish. The difference is evidence and record: CF’s read rests on 3,410 contracts but our 4h record on it is 24%; ECL’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
| The read | Mildly bullish | Mildly bearish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | ||
| Composite | +22.7 | −24.2 |
| Evidence | 56 | 54 |
| Quality | 78 | 82 |
| Price | $111.54 | $281.83 |
| Contracts today | 3,410 | 1,344 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid −1.11% · n=9,499 | hasn’t paid +2.29% · n=7,579 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | ||
| Our record here, 4h | 24% of 424 checked | 12% of 1,415 checked |
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
CFECLtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.