CTRA has the strongest read; XOM has the most behind it.
Both lean bullish. The difference is evidence and record: XOM’s read rests on 32,598 contracts but our 4h record on it is 20%; CTRA’s bucket has paid historically.
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
CTRAXOMtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Strongly bullish | Mildly bullish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | ||
| Composite | +76.4 | +23.1 |
| Evidence | 45 | 74 |
| Quality | 56 | 82 |
| Price | $32.49 | $168.50 |
| Contracts today | 0 | 32,598 |
| Calibration | has paid +35.42% · n=10,494 | hasn’t paid −0.76% · n=9,666 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | ||
| Our record here, 4h | 1% of 271 checked | 20% of 1,541 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.