Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Sun 11 Oct 2026/US closed · opens Mon 14:30 BST/185 names scored today/last score 16:51 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / DIA vs XLF · /stock/DIA?vs=XLF (was /compare/DIA,XLF)

XLF has the strongest read, and the most behind it.

One lean bullish, one bearish. The difference is evidence and record: XLF’s read rests on 184,520 contracts but our 4h record on it is 6%; XLF’s bucket has paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02

Tape, 41 days, same axis

DIAXLFtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
DIA etf×
XLF etf×
The readMildly bullishMildly bearish
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite+19.3−24.5
Evidence 76 79
Quality9384
Price$511.65$53.62
Contracts today43,898184,520
Calibrationhasn’t paid −1.08% · n=2,233
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h13% of 657 checked6% of 522 checked

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add IWMWhy is XLF’s record 6%?