Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Sun 18 Oct 2026/US closed · opens Mon 14:30 BST/30 names scored today/last score 02:38 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / GLD vs SPY, XLF · /stock/GLD?vs=SPY,XLF (was /compare/GLD,SPY,XLF)

GLD has the strongest read; SPY has the most behind it.

One lean bullish, two bearish. The difference is evidence and record: SPY’s read rests on 14,221,662 contracts but our 4h record on it is 3%; GLD’s bucket has paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 3 names as a list.
GLD etf×
SPY etf×
XLF etf×
The readStrongly bullishMildly bearishMildly bearish
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite+25.2−19.5−24.5
Evidence 75 80 79
Quality828584
Price$378.62$776.93$53.62
Contracts today61,48314,221,662184,520
Calibration
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h61% of 994 checked3% of 1,123 checked6% of 522 checked
02

Tape, 43 days, same axis

GLDSPYXLFtape_history · hourly, daily close shown

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add IWMWhy is SPY’s record 3%?