HAL has the strongest read; XOM has the most behind it.
Both lean bullish. The difference is evidence and record: XOM’s read rests on 32,598 contracts but our 4h record on it is 20%; HAL’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
HALXOMtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Strongly bullish | Mildly bullish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | ||
| Composite | +41.6 | +23.1 |
| Evidence | 66 | 74 |
| Quality | 79 | 82 |
| Price | $32.57 | $168.50 |
| Contracts today | 3,721 | 32,598 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid −0.09% · n=87,750 | hasn’t paid −0.83% · n=9,187 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | ||
| Our record here, 4h | 66% of 1,177 checked | 20% of 1,541 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.