HYFT MindWalk Holdings Corp
$1.16 · −6.45% vs $1.24 close · scored 06:54 · stale
Decision brief
BULLISH · 42/100
What changed
Composite strengthened 1.5 points.
Evidence is stale — treat this read cautiously.
What would change the view
composite falls below +15 · confidence deteriorates materially from 42/100
For the read
options volume favours calls · open interest agrees with the read
Against / uncertainty
evidence confidence is weak · data quality is weak
The read
Strongly bullish, thinly evidenced , but it’s confirming price rather than calling it.
−100 bearish 0 bullish +100
+99.7 composite┆ +98.2 yesterday (+1.5) +1.0 vs a week ago
Evidence
42 / 100 · top 72% today
1 contracts · quality 24 · stability 0.63
has paid +0.78% · n=38,227
What traded today · weight 62%
+62.0 pts
1 calls · 100.0% 0 puts
bias +100.0 × 0.62
What’s on the books · weight 38%
+37.7 pts
2,559 call OI · 99.6% 11 put OI
bias +99.1 × 0.38
Equals
+99.7
62% of the score comes from today’s volume, 38% from open interest. Disagree with either?
See the method.
tape composite (bars)— price ◆ big one-day moves 30d: price −5.34% · tape +1.4 · corr -0.03
▼ low −25.6 ◆ −124.0 in a day ● peak +100 09-29 10-01 10-03 10-05 10-08 10-16 10-24 10-25 $2 $1 Plain English: Over 30 days, price has fallen 5.34% while the tape has barely moved (+1.4). The two are drifting apart.
03
Should you trust it? against Thin evidence confidence 42 (28th pct) · quality 24 · 1 contracts
note Jumpy 0.63 vs 7-day rolling · choppiness 0
pass This kind of read has paid strongly bullish · call-heavy · low liquidity → +0.78% avg, n=38,227
note Tape is confirming, not predicting price has led HYFT’s tape by 2 days (r=0.23, n=34)
note Stretched vs its own history today’s tape sits high relative to price
against Our record on HYFT is poor 10% hit rate on 797 closed calls · payoff 0.94×
04
Where the positions sit calls traded strike puts traded
Spot $1.16 highlighted. The $2.50 strike holds the most open interest (the “wall”, 2,009).
05 Our record on HYFT Proof
25 Oct · 4h
$1.16 → $1.16
+0.00% flat
25 Oct · 4h
$1.16 → $1.16
+0.00% flat
22 Oct · 4h
$1.24 → $1.24
+0.00% flat
16 Oct · 4h
$1.40 → $1.40
+0.00% flat
One rule everywhere: a move of 0.05% or less is flat , and flat is not a hit. That is the same rule Proof uses; 645 of these 797 calls were flat.
06
Catalysts & context EPS surprise · last 4 quarters
Street Buy-leaning Next report 14 Sep AMC
P/E — Beta 0.781
52w $0.99–$2.99 IV rank —
Ask about HYFT answers from FlowDesk data only
You
Why did the score rise from +20 to +100 this week?
FlowDesk
It was mostly one day. The composite was +48.7 on 12 Oct, then rose to +98.7 on 16 Oct as the price moved from $1.50 to $1.40. It’s at +99.7 now. Today’s +99.7 breaks down as +62.0 from volume and +37.7 from open interest. I can’t split past days the same way: the stored history keeps call/put volume but not open interest for past days.
tape_history · 35 pts stock_scores · 06:54 method · 62/38
Compare with PACB Why is our HYFT record what it is? What’s the $2.5 wall?
What our data projects
−0.05 points vs the market, next 5 trading days
#1020 of 1610 · helped by price momentum (5 days), last day's move. Not trusted yet: context, not a call.
How
Tell me when… The read flips to bearish composite · crosses 0
Evidence drops below 60 conf · below
Price reaches the $2.5 wall price · above
3 days before earnings not yet · earnings
Score moves ≥10 in a day not yet · delta
Sign in to set alerts. Composite, price and evidence rules work today; earnings and one-day-move rules aren’t built yet.
MindWalk Holdings Corp · Life Sciences Tools & Services
Strongly bullish, thinly evidenced . It’s confirming price rather than calling it.
−100 bearish 0 bullish +100
+99.7 ┆ +98.2 yday evidence 42
has paid +0.78% · n=38,227
Why it’s +100
+62.0 volume · 100% calls+37.7 OI · 100% calls
14 days · tape bars, price line
◆ −124.0 09-29 10-01 10-03 10-05 10-08 10-16 10-24 10-25 $2 $1
Price −5.34%, tape +1.4 over 30 days. The two are drifting apart.
Should you trust it?
against Thin evidence confidence 42 (28th pct) · quality 24 · 1 contracts
note Jumpy 0.63 vs 7-day rolling · choppiness 0
note Tape is confirming, not predicting price has led HYFT’s tape by 2 days (r=0.23, n=34)
note Stretched vs its own history today’s tape sits high relative to price
What traded today · 62%
+62.0 pts
1 calls · 0 puts · bias +100.0
What’s on the books · 38%
+37.7 pts
2,559 call OI · 11 put OI · bias +99.1
tape composite (bars)— price ◆ big one-day moves 30d: price −5.34% · tape +1.4 · corr -0.03
▼ low −25.6 ◆ −124.0 in a day ● peak +100 09-29 10-01 10-03 10-05 10-08 10-16 10-24 10-25 $2 $1 Over 30 days, price has fallen 5.34% while the tape has barely moved (+1.4). The two are drifting apart.
10% hit rate · 797 closed
25 Oct · 4h
$1.16 → $1.16
+0.00% flat
25 Oct · 4h
$1.16 → $1.16
+0.00% flat
22 Oct · 4h
$1.24 → $1.24
+0.00% flat
16 Oct · 4h
$1.40 → $1.40
+0.00% flat
The read flips to bearish composite · crosses 0
Evidence drops below 60 conf · below
Price reaches the $2.5 wall price · above
3 days before earnings not yet · earnings
Score moves ≥10 in a day not yet · delta
Ask about HYFT
Why did the score rise from +20 to +100 this week?
It was mostly one day. The composite was +48.7 on 12 Oct, then rose to +98.7 on 16 Oct as the price moved from $1.50 to $1.40. It’s at +99.7 now. Today’s +99.7 breaks down as +62.0 from volume and +37.7 from open interest. I can’t split past days the same way: the stored history keeps call/put volume but not open interest for past days.
tape_history · 35 pts stock_scores · 06:54 method · 62/38
Compare with PACB Why is our HYFT record what it is? What’s the $2.5 wall?