XLY has the strongest read; IWM has the most behind it.
No lean bullish, two bearish. The difference is evidence and record: IWM’s read rests on 412,364 contracts but our 4h record on it is 19%; XLY’s bucket has paid historically.
Sign in to save these 3 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
IWMXLFXLYtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Neutral | Mildly bearish | Strongly bearish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | |||
| Composite | −6.6 | −24.5 | −31.1 |
| Evidence | 85 | 79 | 62 |
| Quality | 93 | 84 | 79 |
| Price | $270.44 | $53.62 | $110.04 |
| Contracts today | 412,364 | 184,520 | 2,134 |
| Calibration | neutral · +0.64% · n=659 | has paid −0.36% · n=233 | has paid −0.38% · n=14,059 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | |||
| Our record here, 4h | 19% of 2,000 checked | 6% of 522 checked | 17% of 410 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.