XLF has the strongest read; IWM has the most behind it.
One lean bullish, one bearish. The difference is evidence and record: IWM’s read rests on 153,663 contracts but our 4h record on it is 19%; XLF’s bucket has paid historically.
Sign in to save these 3 names as a list.
| The read | Mildly bullish | Neutral | Mildly bearish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | |||
| Composite | +17.3 | −8.8 | −24.5 |
| Evidence | 87 | 76 | 79 |
| Quality | 95 | 85 | 84 |
| Price | $278.94 | $759.66 | $53.62 |
| Contracts today | 153,663 | 9,308,911 | 184,520 |
| Calibration | has paid +1.05% · n=9,329 | neutral · +1.15% · n=1,055 | has paid −0.50% · n=356 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | |||
| Our record here, 4h | 19% of 2,000 checked | 4% of 1,125 checked | 6% of 522 checked |
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
IWMQQQXLFtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.