LOW has the strongest read; AMZN has the most behind it.
All three lean bullish. The difference is evidence and record: AMZN’s read rests on 353,705 contracts but our 4h record on it is 15%; LOW’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.
Sign in to save these 3 names as a list.
| The read | Strongly bullish | Strongly bullish | Strongly bullish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | |||
| Composite | +49.1 | +32.9 | +30.2 |
| Evidence | 67 | 96 | 90 |
| Quality | 80 | 97 | 94 |
| Price | $188.85 | $254.06 | $110.43 |
| Contracts today | 8,306 | 353,705 | 166,855 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid −1.64% · n=25,061 | has paid +1.17% · n=12,971 | has paid +1.17% · n=12,971 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | |||
| Our record here, 4h | 23% of 699 checked | 15% of 2,000 checked | 30% of 685 checked |
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
LOWAMZNWMTtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.