Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Sat 10 Oct 2026/US closed · opens Mon 14:30 BST/317 names scored today/last score 22:02 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / MET vs ALL · /stock/MET?vs=ALL (was /compare/MET,ALL)

ALL has the strongest read; MET has the most behind it.

Both lean bearish. The difference is evidence and record: MET’s read rests on 1,653 contracts but our 4h record on it is 31%; ALL’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
MET MetLife · Insurance×
ALL Allstate · Insurance×
The readMildly bearishStrongly bearish
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite−25.0−36.4
Evidence 65 58
Quality8677
Price$98.47$230.63
Contracts today1,6532,566
Calibrationhasn’t paid +0.98% · n=6,363hasn’t paid +0.27% · n=20,898
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h31% of 326 checked37% of 387 checked
02

Tape, 43 days, same axis

METALLtape_history · hourly, daily close shown

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add TRVWhy is MET’s record 31%?