Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Sat 10 Oct 2026/US closed · opens Mon 14:30 BST/127 names scored today/last score 13:22 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / PG vs EL · /stock/PG?vs=EL (was /compare/PG,EL)

PG has the strongest read, and the most behind it.

Both lean bullish. The difference is evidence and record: PG’s read rests on 5,195 contracts but our 4h record on it is 26%; PG’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02

Tape, 43 days, same axis

PGELtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
PG Procter & Gamble · Consumer products×
EL Estee Lauder Companies · Consumer products×
The readStrongly bullishStrongly bullish
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite+37.2+25.9
Evidence 67 59
Quality8083
Price$144.91$93.81
Contracts today5,195329
Calibrationhasn’t paid −1.64% · n=25,061hasn’t paid −0.01% · n=92,310
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h26% of 315 checked39% of 595 checked

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add LENWhy is PG’s record 26%?