Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Sat 10 Oct 2026/US closed · opens Mon 14:30 BST/109 names scored today/last score 11:07 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / PG vs EL, LEN · /stock/PG?vs=EL,LEN (was /compare/PG,EL,LEN)

LEN has the strongest read, and the most behind it.

Two lean bullish, one bearish. The difference is evidence and record: LEN’s read rests on 9,038 contracts but our 4h record on it is 5%; LEN’s bucket has paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 3 names as a list.
PG Procter & Gamble · Consumer products×
EL Estee Lauder Companies · Consumer products×
LEN Lennar · Consumer products×
The readStrongly bullishStrongly bullishStrongly bearish
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite+37.2+25.9−41.1
Evidence 67 59 74
Quality808389
Price$144.91$93.81$77.60
Contracts today5,1953299,038
Calibrationhasn’t paid −1.64% · n=25,061hasn’t paid −0.01% · n=92,310
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h26% of 315 checked39% of 595 checked5% of 341 checked
02

Tape, 43 days, same axis

PGELLENtape_history · hourly, daily close shown

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add GPROWhy is LEN’s record 5%?