PINS Pinterest Inc
$21.18 · +3.14% vs $20.53 close · scored 15:44 · stale
Decision brief
BULLISH · 73/100
What changed
Composite strengthened 5.1 points.
Evidence is stale — treat this read cautiously.
What would change the view
composite falls below +15 · confidence deteriorates materially from 73/100
For the read
options volume favours calls · open interest agrees with the read · signal has been stable · evidence confidence is high
Against / uncertainty
No material contradiction isolated.
The read
Strongly bullish, well evidenced , but it’s confirming price rather than calling it.
−100 bearish 0 bullish +100
+40.7 composite┆ +35.6 yesterday (+5.1) +8.5 vs a week ago
Evidence
73 / 100 · top 11% today
5,286 contracts · quality 89 · stability 0.88
hasn’t paid −1.64% · n=25,061
What traded today · weight 62%
+30.9 pts
3,962 calls · 75.0% 1,324 puts
bias +49.9 × 0.62
What’s on the books · weight 38%
+9.8 pts
25,546 call OI · 62.9% 15,089 put OI
bias +25.7 × 0.38
Equals
+40.7
76% of the score comes from today’s volume, 24% from open interest. Disagree with either?
See the method.
— price ◆ big one-day moves 30d: price +0.64% · tape −9.4 · corr -0.23
● peak +60 ▼ low −33.0 ◆ +85.1 in a day 08-26 09-02 09-09 09-16 09-24 10-01 10-09 $23 $18 Plain English: Over 30 days, price has risen 0.64% while the tape has faded 9.4 points. The two are drifting apart.
03
Should you trust it? pass Plenty behind it confidence 73 (89th pct) · quality 89 · 5,286 contracts
pass Stable 0.88 vs 7-day rolling · choppiness 21
against This kind of read hasn’t paid strongly bullish · call-heavy · mid liquidity → −1.64% avg, n=25,061
note Tape is confirming, not predicting price has led PINS’s tape by 3 days (r=-0.24, n=42)
against Our record on PINS is poor 27% hit rate on 351 closed calls · payoff 0.32×
04
Where the positions sit calls traded strike puts traded
Spot $21.18 highlighted. The $17 strike holds the most open interest (the “wall”, 6,346). Near-dated expiry in the mix, so OI is noisier.
05 Our record on PINS Proof 9 Oct · 4h
$21.18 → $21.18
+0.00% flat
9 Oct · 4h
$20.53 → $21.18
+3.14% hit
9 Oct · 4h
$20.53 → $21.18
+3.14% hit
9 Oct · 4h
$20.53 → $21.18
+3.14% hit
One rule everywhere: a move of 0.05% or less is flat , and flat is not a hit. That is the same rule Proof uses; 143 of these 351 calls were flat.
06
Catalysts & context EPS surprise · last 4 quarters
Street Buy-leaning Next report —
P/E 46.56 · fwd 10.03 Beta 0.984
52w $13.84–$35.42 IV rank —
Ask about PINS answers from FlowDesk data only
You
Why did the score rise from +32 to +41 this week?
FlowDesk
It was mostly one day. The composite was +24.1 on 6 Oct, then rose to +34.3 on 8 Oct as the price moved from $19.26 to $19.26. It’s at +40.7 now.+30.9 from volume and +9.8 from open interest. I can’t split past days the same way: the stored history keeps call/put volume but not open interest for past days.
tape_history · 43 pts stock_scores · 15:44 method · 62/38
Compare with AMC Why is our PINS record what it is? What’s the $17 wall?
What our data projects
+0.12 points vs the market, next 5 trading days
#207 of 635 · helped by quality, call/put volume tilt, volatility (20 days). Not trusted yet: context, not a call.
How Tell me when… The read flips to bearish composite · crosses 0
Evidence drops below 60 conf · below
Price reaches the $17 wall price · below
3 days before earnings not yet · earnings
Score moves ≥10 in a day not yet · delta
Sign in to set alerts. Composite, price and evidence rules work today; earnings and one-day-move rules aren’t built yet.
Pinterest Inc · Media
Strongly bullish, well evidenced . It’s confirming price rather than calling it.
−100 bearish 0 bullish +100
+40.7 ┆ +35.6 yday evidence
hasn’t paid −1.64% · n=25,061
Why it’s +41
+30.9 volume · 75% calls+9.8 OI · 63% calls
43 days · tape bars, price line
◆ +85.1 08-26 09-02 09-09 09-16 09-24 10-01 10-09 $23 $18 Price +0.64%, tape −9.4 over 30 days. The two are drifting apart.
Should you trust it?
pass Plenty behind it confidence 73 (89th pct) · quality 89 · 5,286 contracts
pass Stable 0.88 vs 7-day rolling · choppiness 21
against This kind of read hasn’t paid strongly bullish · call-heavy · mid liquidity → −1.64% avg, n=25,061
note Tape is confirming, not predicting price has led PINS’s tape by 3 days (r=-0.24, n=42)
What traded today · 62%
+30.9 pts
3,962 calls · 1,324 puts · bias +49.9
What’s on the books · 38%
+9.8 pts
25,546 call OI · 15,089 put OI · bias +25.7
— price ◆ big one-day moves 30d: price +0.64% · tape −9.4 · corr -0.23
● peak +60 ▼ low −33.0 ◆ +85.1 in a day 08-26 09-02 09-09 09-16 09-24 10-01 10-09 $23 $18 Over 30 days, price has risen 0.64% while the tape has faded 9.4 points. The two are drifting apart.
27% hit rate · 351 closed
9 Oct · 4h
$21.18 → $21.18
+0.00% flat
9 Oct · 4h
$20.53 → $21.18
+3.14% hit
9 Oct · 4h
$20.53 → $21.18
+3.14% hit
9 Oct · 4h
$20.53 → $21.18
+3.14% hit
The read flips to bearish composite · crosses 0
Evidence drops below 60 conf · below
Price reaches the $17 wall price · below
3 days before earnings not yet · earnings
Score moves ≥10 in a day not yet · delta
Ask about PINS
Why did the score rise from +32 to +41 this week?
It was mostly one day. The composite was +24.1 on 6 Oct, then rose to +34.3 on 8 Oct as the price moved from $19.26 to $19.26. It’s at +40.7 now.+30.9 from volume and +9.8 from open interest. I can’t split past days the same way: the stored history keeps call/put volume but not open interest for past days.
tape_history · 43 pts stock_scores · 15:44 method · 62/38
Compare with AMC Why is our PINS record what it is? What’s the $17 wall?