QFIN has the strongest read; PYPL has the most behind it.
All three lean bullish. The difference is evidence and record: PYPL’s read rests on 26,699 contracts but our 4h record on it is 4%; QFIN’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.
Sign in to save these 3 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
QFINHOODPYPLtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Strongly bullish | Strongly bullish | Strongly bullish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | |||
| Composite | +83.6 | +37.1 | +30.1 |
| Evidence | 54 | 77 | 82 |
| Quality | 46 | 83 | 93 |
| Price | $6.18 | $112.74 | $55.02 |
| Contracts today | 172 | 128,773 | 26,699 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid −0.01% · n=92,310 | has paid +1.17% · n=12,971 | hasn’t paid −1.64% · n=25,061 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | |||
| Our record here, 4h | 24% of 253 checked | 28% of 799 checked | 4% of 2,000 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.