SLB SLB NV
$48.93 · −0.10% vs $48.98 close · scored 14:34 · stale
Decision brief
BULLISH · 70/100
What changed
The read is broadly unchanged.
Evidence is stale — treat this read cautiously.
What would change the view
composite falls below +15 · confidence deteriorates materially from 70/100
For the read
options volume favours calls · open interest agrees with the read · signal has been stable · evidence confidence is high
Against / uncertainty
No material contradiction isolated.
The read
Strongly bullish, well evidenced , but it’s confirming price rather than calling it.
−100 bearish 0 bullish +100
+50.0 composite┆ +50.0 yesterday (+0.0) +4.8 vs a week ago
Evidence
70 / 100 · top 14% today
4,486 contracts · quality 88 · stability 0.84
hasn’t paid −0.01% · n=92,310
What traded today · weight 62%
+25.2 pts
3,156 calls · 70.4% 1,330 puts
bias +40.7 × 0.62
What’s on the books · weight 38%
+24.8 pts
43,666 call OI · 82.6% 9,202 put OI
bias +65.2 × 0.38
Equals
+50.0
50% of the score comes from today’s volume, 50% from open interest. Disagree with either?
See the method.
— price ◆ big one-day moves 30d: price −14.45% · tape −2.5 · corr -0.15
● peak +71 ▼ low −31.9 ◆ +52.8 in a day 08-27 09-03 09-10 09-18 09-25 10-02 10-09 $60 $48 Plain English: Over 30 days, price has fallen 14.45% while the tape has barely moved (−2.5). They agree.
03
Should you trust it? pass Plenty behind it confidence 70 (86th pct) · quality 88 · 4,486 contracts
pass Stable 0.84 vs 7-day rolling · choppiness 37
against This kind of read hasn’t paid strongly bullish · call-heavy · low liquidity → −0.01% avg, n=92,310
note Tape is confirming, not predicting price has led SLB’s tape by 2 days (r=-0.33, n=44)
note Stretched vs its own history today’s tape sits high relative to price
pass Our record on SLB is good 59% hit rate on 719 closed calls · payoff 0.54×
04
Where the positions sit calls traded strike puts traded
Spot $48.93 highlighted. The $57.50 strike holds the most open interest (the “wall”, 14,096). Near-dated expiry in the mix, so OI is noisier.
9 Oct · 4h
$48.93 → $48.93
+0.00% flat
9 Oct · 4h
$48.98 → $48.93
−0.10% miss
9 Oct · 4h
$48.98 → $48.93
−0.10% miss
9 Oct · 4h
$48.98 → $48.93
−0.10% miss
One rule everywhere: a move of 0.05% or less is flat , and flat is not a hit. That is the same rule Proof uses; 183 of these 719 calls were flat.
06
Catalysts & context EPS surprise · last 4 quarters
Street Buy-leaning Next report —
P/E 22.99 · fwd 17.36 Beta 0.829
52w $31.64–$60.46 IV rank —
Ask about SLB answers from FlowDesk data only
You
Why did the score rise from +45 to +50 this week?
FlowDesk
It was mostly one day. The composite was +18.0 on 7 Oct, then rose to +49.3 on 8 Oct as the price moved from $49.05 to $47.96. It’s at +50.0 now.+25.2 from volume and +24.8 from open interest. I can’t split past days the same way: the stored history keeps call/put volume but not open interest for past days.
tape_history · 45 pts stock_scores · 14:34 method · 62/38
Compare with OXY Why is our SLB record what it is? What’s the $57.5 wall?
What our data projects
+0.32 points vs the market, next 5 trading days
#121 of 635 · helped by quality, call/put volume tilt, confidence. Not trusted yet: context, not a call.
How Tell me when… The read flips to bearish composite · crosses 0
Evidence drops below 60 conf · below
Price reaches the $57.5 wall price · above
3 days before earnings not yet · earnings
Score moves ≥10 in a day not yet · delta
Sign in to set alerts. Composite, price and evidence rules work today; earnings and one-day-move rules aren’t built yet.
SLB NV · Energy
Strongly bullish, well evidenced . It’s confirming price rather than calling it.
−100 bearish 0 bullish +100
+50.0 ┆ +50.0 yday evidence
hasn’t paid −0.01% · n=92,310
Why it’s +50
+25.2 volume · 70% calls+24.8 OI · 83% calls
43 days · tape bars, price line
◆ +52.8 08-27 09-03 09-10 09-18 09-25 10-02 10-09 $60 $48 Price −14.45%, tape −2.5 over 30 days. The two agree.
Should you trust it?
pass Plenty behind it confidence 70 (86th pct) · quality 88 · 4,486 contracts
pass Stable 0.84 vs 7-day rolling · choppiness 37
against This kind of read hasn’t paid strongly bullish · call-heavy · low liquidity → −0.01% avg, n=92,310
note Tape is confirming, not predicting price has led SLB’s tape by 2 days (r=-0.33, n=44)
What traded today · 62%
+25.2 pts
3,156 calls · 1,330 puts · bias +40.7
What’s on the books · 38%
+24.8 pts
43,666 call OI · 9,202 put OI · bias +65.2
— price ◆ big one-day moves 30d: price −14.45% · tape −2.5 · corr -0.15
● peak +71 ▼ low −31.9 ◆ +52.8 in a day 08-27 09-03 09-10 09-18 09-25 10-02 10-09 $60 $48 Over 30 days, price has fallen 14.45% while the tape has barely moved (−2.5). They agree.
59% hit rate · 719 closed
9 Oct · 4h
$48.93 → $48.93
+0.00% flat
9 Oct · 4h
$48.98 → $48.93
−0.10% miss
9 Oct · 4h
$48.98 → $48.93
−0.10% miss
9 Oct · 4h
$48.98 → $48.93
−0.10% miss
The read flips to bearish composite · crosses 0
Evidence drops below 60 conf · below
Price reaches the $57.5 wall price · above
3 days before earnings not yet · earnings
Score moves ≥10 in a day not yet · delta
Ask about SLB
Why did the score rise from +45 to +50 this week?
It was mostly one day. The composite was +18.0 on 7 Oct, then rose to +49.3 on 8 Oct as the price moved from $49.05 to $47.96. It’s at +50.0 now.+25.2 from volume and +24.8 from open interest. I can’t split past days the same way: the stored history keeps call/put volume but not open interest for past days.
tape_history · 45 pts stock_scores · 14:34 method · 62/38
Compare with OXY Why is our SLB record what it is? What’s the $57.5 wall?