Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Mon 19 Oct 2026/US open/342 names scored today/last score 19:34 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / SNOW vs SQ · /stock/SNOW?vs=SQ (was /compare/SNOW,SQ)

SQ has the strongest read, and the most behind it.

One lean bullish, no bearish. The difference is evidence and record: SQ’s read rests on 43,471 contracts but our 4h record on it is 0%; SQ’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
SNOW Snowflake · Technology×
SQ technology×
The readNeutralStrongly bullish
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite+9.6+34.5
Evidence 77 88
Quality9597
Price$343.00$0.00
Contracts today26,55043,471
Calibrationneutral · +0.01% · n=2,880hasn’t paid −1.09% · n=8,431
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h10% of 244 checked0% of 146 checked
02

Tape, 38 days, same axis

SNOWSQtape_history · hourly, daily close shown

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add ORCLWhy is SQ’s record 0%?