Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Sun 18 Oct 2026/US closed · opens Mon 14:30 BST/30 names scored today/last score 02:38 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / SPY vs XLF, EEM · /stock/SPY?vs=XLF,EEM (was /compare/SPY,XLF,EEM)

EEM has the strongest read; SPY has the most behind it.

All three lean bearish. The difference is evidence and record: SPY’s read rests on 14,221,662 contracts but our 4h record on it is 3%; EEM’s bucket has paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 3 names as a list.
SPY etf×
XLF etf×
EEM etf×
The readMildly bearishMildly bearishStrongly bearish
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite−19.5−24.5−26.0
Evidence 80 79 74
Quality858483
Price$776.93$53.62$67.67
Contracts today14,221,662184,52054,862
Calibration
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h3% of 1,123 checked6% of 522 checked6% of 391 checked
02

Tape, 43 days, same axis

SPYXLFEEMtape_history · hourly, daily close shown

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add IWMWhy is SPY’s record 3%?