TFC has the strongest read; JPM has the most behind it.
One lean bullish, one bearish. The difference is evidence and record: JPM’s read rests on 25,073 contracts but our 4h record on it is 13%; TFC’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
| The read | Strongly bearish | Strongly bullish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | ||
| Composite | −37.6 | +33.1 |
| Evidence | 55 | 80 |
| Quality | 60 | 91 |
| Price | $46.18 | $332.99 |
| Contracts today | 833 | 25,073 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid +0.10% · n=21,921 | hasn’t paid −1.64% · n=25,061 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | ||
| Our record here, 4h | 34% of 295 checked | 13% of 1,458 checked |
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
TFCJPMtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.