WFC Wells Fargo & Co
$82.03 · +0.00% vs $82.03 close · scored 14:23 · stale
Decision brief
BULLISH · 73/100
What changed
No prior comparable read.
Evidence is stale — treat this read cautiously.
What would change the view
composite falls below +15 · confidence deteriorates materially from 73/100
For the read
options volume favours calls · open interest agrees with the read · evidence confidence is high
Against / uncertainty
signal stability is low
The read
Strongly bullish, well evidenced , but it’s confirming price rather than calling it.
−100 bearish 0 bullish +100
+44.9 composite+21.6 vs a week ago
Evidence
73 / 100 · top 11% today
22,477 contracts · quality 82 · stability 0.00
hasn’t paid −1.64% · n=25,061
What traded today · weight 62%
+38.2 pts
18,169 calls · 80.8% 4,308 puts
bias +61.7 × 0.62
What’s on the books · weight 38%
+6.7 pts
138,907 call OI · 58.8% 97,529 put OI
bias +17.5 × 0.38
Equals
+44.9
85% of the score comes from today’s volume, 15% from open interest. Disagree with either?
See the method.
— price ◆ big one-day moves 30d: price −8.52% · tape +30.7 · corr 0.04
▼ low −28.1 ◆ +67.1 in a day ● peak +45 09-26 09-28 09-30 10-02 10-04 10-06 10-08 10-09 $90 $80 Plain English: Over 30 days, price has fallen 8.52% while the tape has firmed 30.7 points. The two are drifting apart.
03
Should you trust it? pass Plenty behind it confidence 73 (89th pct) · quality 82 · 22,477 contracts
note Jumpy 0.00 vs 7-day rolling · choppiness 21
against This kind of read hasn’t paid strongly bullish · call-heavy · mid liquidity → −1.64% avg, n=25,061
note Tape is confirming, not predicting price has led WFC’s tape by 3 days (r=-0.17, n=52)
note Stretched vs its own history today’s tape sits high relative to price
against Our record on WFC is poor 10% hit rate on 1392 closed calls · payoff 0.48×
04
Where the positions sit calls traded strike puts traded
Spot $82.03 highlighted. The $85 strike holds the most open interest (the “wall”, 27,025). Near-dated expiry in the mix, so OI is noisier.
10%
hit rate · 1392 closed
9 Oct · 4h
$82.03 → $82.03
+0.00% flat
9 Oct · 4h
$82.03 → $82.03
+0.00% flat
9 Oct · 4h
$82.03 → $82.03
+0.00% flat
9 Oct · 4h
$82.03 → $82.03
+0.00% flat
One rule everywhere: a move of 0.05% or less is flat , and flat is not a hit. That is the same rule Proof uses; 1113 of these 1392 calls were flat.
06
Catalysts & context EPS surprise · last 4 quarters
Street Buy-leaning Next report —
P/E 10.55 · fwd 11.18 Beta 0.945
52w $72.78–$97.76 IV rank —
Ask about WFC answers from FlowDesk data only
You
Why did the score rise from +23 to +45 this week?
FlowDesk
It was mostly one day. The composite was +23.3 on 7 Oct, then rose to +43.9 on 8 Oct as the price moved from $80.33 to $80.26. It’s at +44.9 now.+38.2 from volume and +6.7 from open interest. I can’t split past days the same way: the stored history keeps call/put volume but not open interest for past days.
tape_history · 53 pts stock_scores · 14:23 method · 62/38
Compare with NU Why is our WFC record what it is? What’s the $85 wall?
What our data projects
−0.07 points vs the market, next 5 trading days
#314 of 635 · helped by quality, call/put volume tilt, confidence. Not trusted yet: context, not a call.
How Tell me when… The read flips to bearish composite · crosses 0
Evidence drops below 60 conf · below
Price reaches the $85 wall price · above
3 days before earnings not yet · earnings
Score moves ≥10 in a day not yet · delta
Sign in to set alerts. Composite, price and evidence rules work today; earnings and one-day-move rules aren’t built yet.
Wells Fargo & Co · Banking
Strongly bullish, well evidenced . It’s confirming price rather than calling it.
−100 bearish 0 bullish +100
+44.9 evidence
hasn’t paid −1.64% · n=25,061
Why it’s +45
+38.2 volume · 81% calls+6.7 OI · 59% calls
14 days · tape bars, price line
◆ +67.1 09-26 09-28 09-30 10-02 10-04 10-06 10-08 10-09 $90 $80 Price −8.52%, tape +30.7 over 30 days. The two are drifting apart.
Should you trust it?
pass Plenty behind it confidence 73 (89th pct) · quality 82 · 22,477 contracts
note Jumpy 0.00 vs 7-day rolling · choppiness 21
against This kind of read hasn’t paid strongly bullish · call-heavy · mid liquidity → −1.64% avg, n=25,061
note Tape is confirming, not predicting price has led WFC’s tape by 3 days (r=-0.17, n=52)
What traded today · 62%
+38.2 pts
18,169 calls · 4,308 puts · bias +61.7
What’s on the books · 38%
+6.7 pts
138,907 call OI · 97,529 put OI · bias +17.5
— price ◆ big one-day moves 30d: price −8.52% · tape +30.7 · corr 0.04
▼ low −28.1 ◆ +67.1 in a day ● peak +45 09-26 09-28 09-30 10-02 10-04 10-06 10-08 10-09 $90 $80 Over 30 days, price has fallen 8.52% while the tape has firmed 30.7 points. The two are drifting apart.
10% hit rate · 1392 closed
9 Oct · 4h
$82.03 → $82.03
+0.00% flat
9 Oct · 4h
$82.03 → $82.03
+0.00% flat
9 Oct · 4h
$82.03 → $82.03
+0.00% flat
9 Oct · 4h
$82.03 → $82.03
+0.00% flat
The read flips to bearish composite · crosses 0
Evidence drops below 60 conf · below
Price reaches the $85 wall price · above
3 days before earnings not yet · earnings
Score moves ≥10 in a day not yet · delta
Ask about WFC
Why did the score rise from +23 to +45 this week?
It was mostly one day. The composite was +23.3 on 7 Oct, then rose to +43.9 on 8 Oct as the price moved from $80.33 to $80.26. It’s at +44.9 now.+38.2 from volume and +6.7 from open interest. I can’t split past days the same way: the stored history keeps call/put volume but not open interest for past days.
tape_history · 53 pts stock_scores · 14:23 method · 62/38
Compare with NU Why is our WFC record what it is? What’s the $85 wall?