Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Sun 18 Oct 2026/US closed · opens Mon 14:30 BST/39 names scored today/last score 03:06 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / XLE vs XLF · /stock/XLE?vs=XLF (was /compare/XLE,XLF)

XLF has the strongest read, and the most behind it.

One lean bullish, one bearish. The difference is evidence and record: XLF’s read rests on 184,520 contracts but our 4h record on it is 6%; XLF’s bucket has paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
XLE etf×
XLF etf×
The readMildly bullishMildly bearish
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite+22.4−24.5
Evidence 74 79
Quality9184
Price$65.70$53.62
Contracts today18,723184,520
Calibrationhasn’t paid −1.55% · n=2,677
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h16% of 590 checked6% of 522 checked
02

Tape, 43 days, same axis

XLEXLFtape_history · hourly, daily close shown

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add IWMWhy is XLF’s record 6%?