XLF has the strongest read; SPY has the most behind it.
All three lean bearish. The difference is evidence and record: SPY’s read rests on 14,221,662 contracts but our 4h record on it is 3%; XLF’s bucket has paid historically.
Sign in to save these 3 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
XLPSPYXLFtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Mildly bearish | Mildly bearish | Mildly bearish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | |||
| Composite | −17.4 | −19.5 | −24.5 |
| Evidence | 67 | 80 | 79 |
| Quality | 82 | 85 | 84 |
| Price | $83.17 | $776.93 | $53.62 |
| Contracts today | 18,091 | 14,221,662 | 184,520 |
| Calibration | has paid −0.71% · n=559 | has paid −0.21% · n=201 | has paid −0.36% · n=233 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | |||
| Our record here, 4h | 22% of 1,005 checked | 3% of 1,123 checked | 6% of 522 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.