Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Sun 18 Oct 2026/US closed · opens Mon 14:30 BST/30 names scored today/last score 02:38 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / XLP vs IWM · /stock/XLP?vs=IWM (was /compare/XLP,IWM)

XLP has the strongest read; IWM has the most behind it.

No lean bullish, one bearish. The difference is evidence and record: IWM’s read rests on 412,364 contracts but our 4h record on it is 19%; XLP’s bucket has paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
XLP etf×
IWM etf×
The readMildly bearishNeutral
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite−17.4−6.6
Evidence 67 85
Quality8293
Price$83.17$270.44
Contracts today18,091412,364
Calibrationneutral · +0.64% · n=659
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h22% of 1,005 checked19% of 2,000 checked
02

Tape, 43 days, same axis

XLPIWMtape_history · hourly, daily close shown

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add SPYWhy is IWM’s record 19%?